Abrahamic Religions, by Aaron W. Hughes

Abrahamic-Religions-Hughes-Aaron-W-9780199934645I just finished Aaron W. Hughes’ recent book, Abrahamic Religions: On the Uses and Abuses of History (Oxford UP, 2012). In this book, Hughes makes the (not so) radical claim that “we must necessarily be aware of the motivations, methods, and cultural baggage that we bring to our study” (102). Hughes writes, “we must ultimately confront the reality that many of the terms and categories that we are fond of employing are little more than untheorized folk taxa” (103).

[O]ur use of words, especially when it comes to the academic study of religion, is never value-neutral. Rather, there is a tendency to create terms, definitions, and essence that create the type of reality that we want to see. In the case of “Abrahamic religions,” many of the terms employed even today in academic study derive their meanings and potencies from interfaith circles. (116-117)

“Abrahmic religions” and the rather romantic narratives we spin about this construction appear to be designed—at present—to reconcile communities that often see themselves at odds with one another. While “interfaith” objectives might be admirable, the aims of “interfaith” work are not necessarily academic, and the concepts used in such work do not have a clear analytical usefulness. In addition, all too often it turns out that the “past that is appealed to is one that has been retrofitted with the concerns of the present” (121).

It’s an excellent book that deserves to be the book on the subject matter.


About Craig Martin

I am an Associate Professor of Religious Studies at St. Thomas Aquinas College.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Abrahamic Religions, by Aaron W. Hughes

  1. Matt Sheedy says:

    I already posted this comment on Facebook, but figured I’d reproduce it here lest FB get all the attention and our various “reply” sections none at all:
    Sounds intriguing! I’ve often wondered if we’d be better off by grouping “inter-faith” initiatives as a branch of political theory where normative aims are generally more accepted. While I find myself often agreeing with some of the better “inter-faith” ideas, their usefulness as political strategies is clearly different from scholarship… and sometimes they’re just plain bad for politics too…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s